Multiple Choice
In opposing the proposition "equipping cars with anti-lock brakes does not reduce accidents," an argument stating "teaching drivers to use anti-lock brakes properly, by applying them forcefully won't prevent them from overdriving the conditions" would be
A) an effect argument.
B) an inherency argument.
C) a significance argument.
D) a pre-emptive argument.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: The opponent in factual argumentation may not
Q9: The opponent's strategy of extenuation is a
Q10: In advocating the proposition "equipping cars with
Q11: A brief should contain your main points,
Q12: The opponents final strategic decision is to<br>A)determine
Q14: A denial argument suggests the advocate's argument
Q15: In factual argumentation, arguments about focus on
Q16: In using the stock issues in factual
Q17: The idea of briefing arguments is adapted
Q18: In factual argumentation, we can seek knowledge