Multiple Choice
Which of the following two are features of a legitimate acceptance of a repudiatory breach as set out by Lord Steyn in Vitol v Norelf?
A) The acceptance of a repudiatory breach must be effectively communicated like any other contractual acceptance
B) An act of acceptance of a repudiation requires no particular form
C) The aggrieved party must notify the other party to the contract before they may engage in a similar contract elsewhere to allow the party in breach to correct their performance
D) The aggrieved party need not personally, or by an agent, notify the repudiating party of his election to treat the contract as at an end
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q20: Intermediate terms could be regarded as bringing
Q21: In which cases have the courts overtly
Q22: Should the commission of a repudiatory breach
Q23: In <em class="italic">Arcos Ltd v EA Ronaasen
Q24: In <em class="italic">Schuler v Wickman</em> the House
Q26: Why did the House of Lords disagree
Q27: An repudiatory breach need not be accepted
Q28: Distinguish between rescission and repudiation.
Q29: George hired Amanda to fit a central
Q30: Today, all terms must be regarded as