True/False
In Arcos Ltd v EA Ronaasen & Son a contract was held not discharged because the timber supplied was 1/8 of an inch thicker than agreed, despite being usable for its intended purpose.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Related Questions
Q18: Agnes has a contract to produce business
Q19: How do the Principles of European Contract
Q20: Intermediate terms could be regarded as bringing
Q21: In which cases have the courts overtly
Q22: Should the commission of a repudiatory breach
Q24: In <em class="italic">Schuler v Wickman</em> the House
Q25: Which of the following two are features
Q26: Why did the House of Lords disagree
Q27: An repudiatory breach need not be accepted
Q28: Distinguish between rescission and repudiation.