Solved

In Scheerer V

Question 481

True/False

In Scheerer v. Fisher, where Scheerer claimed he was cut out of a real estate commission he should have received, the appeals court held he had no claim for payment as there was no written agreement as required by the Statute of Frauds.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Q476: In contract law, an agreement means there

Q477: Contracts that unreasonably restrict competition are unenforceable.

Q478: In Hinson v. N&W Construction, where Hinson

Q479: Withdrawal of an offer by the offeror

Q480: Most contracts are unilateral.

Q482: A binding promise is:<br>A) a contract by

Q483: In Hinson v. N&W Construction, where Hinson

Q484: For Amy's sixteenth birthday her parents give

Q485: Quasi contract is used to prevent quantum

Q486: You leave your poodle at a new