In US V Trenton Potteries Co

Multiple Choice

In U.S. v. Trenton Potteries Co., competitors openly fixed prices and restrained sales. The Supreme Court held that:

A) Section 2 of the Clayton Act was unconstitutional
B) horizontal groupings that do not involve mergers are not illegal
C) cartels that serve to lower consumer prices may be legal
D) trade associations that openly announce fixed prices do not violate the law
E) none of the other choices