In Leegin Creative Leather Products V

Multiple Choice

In Leegin Creative Leather Products v. PSKS, a maker of leather goods would not sell to stores that would not follow its pricing policy (resale price maintenance) . The Supreme Court held that:

A) all vertical price fixing subject to a per se rule of illegality
B) vertical price restraints would be viewed under a rule of reason
C) vertical price restraints injure the ability of sellers to compete so are generally illegal
D) vertical price fixing of minimum prices is subject to a per se rule of illegality
E) none of the other choices