Multiple Choice
Matching: Common Rationalizations
-This rationalization might be used by a coach who allows the child of a major donor to new athletic fields to be the "star" of the team when in reality, the student is on a par with his or her teammates. The rationalization underestimates the subtle ways in which gratitude, friendship, and favors affect judgment.
A) "If it's necessary, it is ethical."
B) "If it's legal and permissible, it's proper."
C) "I was just doing it for you."
D) "I'm just fighting fire with fire."
E) "It doesn't hurt anyone."
F) "It can't be wrong; everyone's doing it."
G) "It's O.K. if I don't gain personally."
H) "I've got it coming."
I) "I can still be objective."
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q24: More Matching<br>-A statement or conclusion about an
Q25: Considering the four ethical tests listed in
Q26: Matching: Common Rationalizations<br>-This rationalization could apply to
Q27: Explain value conflicts, using two examples.
Q28: Matching: Common Rationalizations<br>-This rationalization is based on
Q29: Match the correct ethical system with the
Q30: More Matching<br>-Statements given to support conclusions<br>A) Claim<br>B)
Q31: Match the correct ethical system with the
Q32: In Toulmin's Model, "warrants" are reasons that
Q33: Match the correct ethical system with the