Scenario: Currently, major corn-growing states, such as Iowa, use large amounts of nitrogen-based fertilizers. Many of Iowa's corn-growing regions are characterized by karst topography (water erodes the limestone bedrock and forms sinkholes, caves, and underground streams). In karst landscapes, runoff from corn fields contains high levels of nitrogen in the form of nitrates, which can pollute private and municipal water wells. Suppose the demand and supply for corn are:
Corn Demand: Qᴰ = 70 - 5p,
Corn Supply: Qˢ = 10p - 5,
where quantity is millions of bushels of corn and price is dollars per bushel. The marginal private benefit of corn and the marginal private cost of corn production can be derived by rewriting demand and supply with price as a function of quantity:
Inverse Demand: p = 14 - 0.2Q
Marginal Private Benefit: MPB = 14 - 0.2Q
Inverse Supply: p = 0.1Q + 0.5
Marginal Private Cost: MPC = 0.1Q + 0.5
Suppose the marginal external cost (MEC) of nitrogen fertilizer use in corn growing is a constant $1.50 per bushel, so MEC = 1.5. The marginal social cost (MSC) is:
MSC = MPC + MEC = 0.1Q + 0.5 + 1.5
MSC = 0.1Q + 2
The figure below shows these marginal benefits and marginal costs.

-Refer to the scenario above.The private market equilibrium price is ________ per bushel,and the private market equilibrium quantity is ________ bushels.
A) $4; 50 million
B) $5; 40 million
C) $5; 45 million
D) $6; 40 million

Which of the Following Is True

Multiple Choice

Correct Answer:VerifiedUnlock this answer nowGet Access to more Verified Answers free of chargeAccess For Free

Correct Answer:
Verified
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge