In Triffin V

Multiple Choice

In Triffin v. Pomerantz Staffing Services, 851 A.2d 100 (N.J. Super. 2004) , the court held that Friendly's (and Triffin's as its assignee) :

A) met the "with notice" requirement
B) met the "without notice" requirement
C) failed to meet the "without notice" requirement
D) failed to meet the "with notice" requirement