Essay
Planter is a consultant for Succulent Co. and they issue him a $5,000 check payable to cash as payment. Before leaving for the bus, the Planter, in hast, stuffs the check in his briefcase without indorsement. Later that day, the briefcase is stolen, and the thief then signs his own name and indorses it with "Pay to the Order of Kane's Furniture." The thief delivers the check to the furniture store to satisfy an outstanding debt on a recent purchase. Your common sense may tell you that the thief would not prevail in this case, but what is the legal reasoning? Classify the roles of Planter, Succulent Co., and the thief classified in this transaction? Explain.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Succulent Co. issued a bearer instrument...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q38: In Hemmings v. Camping Time RV Centers
Q39: If the instrument is in bearer form,
Q40: _ is an example of a claim
Q41: A holder gains a sort of super
Q42: In Triffin v. Pomerantz Staffing Services, 851
Q44: Legislatures and courts have recognized _ transfers
Q45: The _ promoted a regulation that preserves
Q46: The UCC does not confer a _
Q47: The Holder Rule _ a consumer's rights
Q48: The most important part of understanding the