Multiple Choice
MATCHING
-Evanescent evidence
A) Evidence that will change or evaporate in a manner that will destroy its evidentiary value.
B) An exception to the warrant to search requirement which says that consent to enter given to an undercover police officer or informant transfers to others in the police force who may then enter without a warrant.
C) The act of admitting guilt to a crime.
D) The 'fruit of the poisonous tree' doctrine that prohibits the admission of evidence obtained illegally at a defendant's criminal trial.
E) Situations that require urgent action, sufficient to excuse delay to get a warrant.
F) The act of giving testimony against one's penal interest.
G) The right not to testify against their own interests when accused of a crime.
H) Police officers may briefly stop, identify, and frisk persons reasonably believed to have committed a crime during the course of an investigation.
I) Money or other guarantee posted to assure a defendant who is released form custody pending trial or appeal will appear when called or forfeit the security posted.
J) A presumption that can be overcome by presenting evidence to the contrary
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: What might a magistrate ask for, if
Q2: Officers must quickly obtain a search warrant
Q3: Explain the protections from Double Jeopardy and
Q4: The rule that a person cannot be
Q5: A presumption that can be overcome by
Q7: A person is charged with murder. The
Q8: Evidence that is obtained through a search
Q9: Which of the following is NOT true?<br>A)
Q10: Which of the following is an example
Q11: MATCHING<br>-Rebuttable presumption<br>A) Evidence that will change or