Multiple Choice
MATCHING
-Rebuttable presumption
A) Evidence that will change or evaporate in a manner that will destroy its evidentiary value.
B) An exception to the warrant to search requirement which says that consent to enter given to an undercover police officer or informant transfers to others in the police force who may then enter without a warrant.
C) The act of admitting guilt to a crime.
D) The 'fruit of the poisonous tree' doctrine that prohibits the admission of evidence obtained illegally at a defendant's criminal trial.
E) Situations that require urgent action, sufficient to excuse delay to get a warrant.
F) The act of giving testimony against one's penal interest.
G) The right not to testify against their own interests when accused of a crime.
H) Police officers may briefly stop, identify, and frisk persons reasonably believed to have committed a crime during the course of an investigation.
I) Money or other guarantee posted to assure a defendant who is released form custody pending trial or appeal will appear when called or forfeit the security posted.
J) A presumption that can be overcome by presenting evidence to the contrary
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q6: MATCHING<br>-Evanescent evidence<br>A) Evidence that will change or
Q7: A person is charged with murder. The
Q8: Evidence that is obtained through a search
Q9: Which of the following is NOT true?<br>A)
Q10: Which of the following is an example
Q12: MATCHING<br>-Exigent circumstances<br>A) Evidence that will change or
Q13: MATCHING<br>-Consent once removed<br>A) Evidence that will change
Q14: Probable cause is;<br>A) sufficient evidence that it
Q15: Historically, French control over the lives of
Q16: If a state changes the interval between