True/False
The Kumho decision examined the language in Rule 702 underlying the Daubert decision and found that the wording made no distinction between "scientific" knowledge and "technical" or "other specialized" knowledge.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Related Questions
Q8: Which of the following questions are important
Q9: Which of the following is not correct
Q10: Scientific evidence has a highly technical basis
Q11: According to Daubert, to determine if testimony
Q12: The 1923 landmark case where a federal
Q14: Prior to Daubert, abuse of discretion was
Q15: The Frye test is no longer used
Q16: The Relevancy test, which began being increasingly
Q17: The Kumho decision decided that Daubert does
Q18: In 1997, the issue of whether abuse