True/False
Prior to Daubert, abuse of discretion was the standard of review applied by appellate courts in reviewing a trial court's decision to admit or exclude expert testimony.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Related Questions
Q9: Which of the following is not correct
Q10: Scientific evidence has a highly technical basis
Q11: According to Daubert, to determine if testimony
Q12: The 1923 landmark case where a federal
Q13: The Kumho decision examined the language in
Q15: The Frye test is no longer used
Q16: The Relevancy test, which began being increasingly
Q17: The Kumho decision decided that Daubert does
Q18: In 1997, the issue of whether abuse
Q19: The Daubert Court held that the trial