Solved

Which of the Following Is NOT a Reason to Scientifically

Question 10

Multiple Choice

Which of the following is NOT a reason to scientifically evaluate the plausibility of claims made by a psychic who states that a missing child is alive and located in a particular area of the countryside months after the child went missing?


A) Precious time finding the child could be lost.
B) Manpower could be wasted looking in a location when there is no evidence indicating the child might be there.
C) It could cause additional and unnecessary grief when the new hopes and expectations of the parents are dashed.
D) There is anecdotal evidence suggesting that psychics can predict the location of missing children.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions