The Supreme Court of Canada's Decision in Aubry V Editions

Multiple Choice

The Supreme Court of Canada's decision in Aubry v Editions Vice-Versa Inc supports the proposition that

A) a man may be awarded compensation if, without permission, a company reveals that it surgically attached a hairpiece to his scalp.
B) a company that publishes photographs may need to secure consent of a person who appears in a photograph taken in Quebec.
C) damages may be awarded if a company creates an advertisement that uses a celebrity's image without permission.
D) a newspaper may be held liable for printing a photograph of a celebrity and truthfully explaining that it was shot as he was leaving a drug rehabilitation facility.
E) a person who commits the crime of voyeurism can also be held liable for the tort of invasion of privacy.