Multiple Choice
Brewster and Constance are neighbours.They both live near the outdoor stadium that hosts sporting events and concerts in their city.For many years, Brewster and Constance both earned a great deal of money by using their lawns as parking lots during stadium events.Recently, however, attendance at stadium events has plummeted and there are not enough customers to keep both Brewster and Constance happy.The two therefore began to compete for business.In a desperate bid to win the competition, Constance threatened motorists who appeared to be headed for Brewster's property.ONE of the elements that Brewster must prove in order to hold Constance liable for the unlawful means tort is that
A) his property shares a legal boundary with her property.
B) a reasonable person in Constance's position would have realized that her behaviour violated Brewster's rights.
C) Constance was motivated by a desire to earn greater profits.
D) Constance committed a crime when she threatened Brewster's potential customers.
E) Constance committed a tort against Brewster's potential customers when she threatened them.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q50: Dakota sued Mariah for the tort of
Q51: The defence of statutory authority applies only
Q52: Sweety Cola and Bubbly Cola are competitors
Q53: Briefly explain the difference between the tort
Q54: Dylan committed the tort of deceit against
Q56: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Q57: You invited your friend Suri to your
Q58: Which of the following factors is relevant
Q59: Alan had purchased all of his business
Q60: You and I are competitors in the