Multiple Choice
Sweety Cola and Bubbly Cola are competitors in the cola market.Both companies spend a great deal of money on advertising in an attempt to lure customers away from the competitor.Those advertisements, however, occasionally backfire.A court recently held Sweety Cola liable to Bubbly Cola under the tort of injurious falsehood.That decision is most likely to have been delivered if Sweety Cola
A) falsely claimed that its own beverages contain zero calories.
B) created a dishonest advertising campaign that caused one restaurant chain to break its contract to purchase beverages from Bubbly Cola.
C) honestly, but incorrectly, said that Bubbly Cola's beverages contain inferior ingredients.
D) caused some consumers to believe that Sweety Cola products were manufactured by Bubbly Cola.
E) persistently claimed that its beverage tasted better than Bubbly Cola's beverage, even taste is entirely a personal preference.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q47: A person cannot be held liable for
Q48: Casey published an untrue, unfounded, and unfavourable
Q49: Emily was involved in a business dispute
Q50: Dakota sued Mariah for the tort of
Q51: The defence of statutory authority applies only
Q53: Briefly explain the difference between the tort
Q54: Dylan committed the tort of deceit against
Q55: Brewster and Constance are neighbours.They both live
Q56: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Q57: You invited your friend Suri to your