Essay
A purchaser bought an oil painting from a private collector who promised that it was painted by one of the members of the Group of Seven, a promise that was held to be one of the terms of the contract.The painting quickly became the purchasers favourite.He took it home and built a special room for its viewing, with an expensive lighting system.Five years later, after having grown somewhat tired of the room, the purchaser decided to sell the painting.In so doing, he discovered much to his chagrin that the painting was worth much less than he had thought as it was, in fact, done by a less famous American painter, who worked in a style similar to the Group of Seven.The purchaser decided to try to get his money back.He sued the private collector who sold it to him, asking the court to rescind the contract on the ground that there had been an innocent misrepresentation.What are the most plausible grounds upon which the court might decide not to rescind?
Correct Answer:

Verified
The court would likely hold that after f...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q65: Someone who signs a document in a
Q66: A misstatement of the law is identical
Q67: When will silence distort a previous assertion?<br>A)whenever
Q68: A ticket contract is<br>A)never enforceable.<br>B)enforceable only if
Q69: What is the rationale for holding people
Q70: In order to get Susannah to buy
Q71: Ranjit purchased a complex computer system from
Q72: In order for a standard form contract
Q73: Personal opinions are not usually treated as
Q74: Which of the following is NOT an