Multiple Choice
Why was the statement found not to be a term in the case of: Oscar Chess v Williams [1957] 1 All ER 325?
A) The statement was a term.
B) The plaintiff buyer had special skills or knowledge in relation to the subject matter.
C) Neither party was in a position to know the truth.
D) The defendant seller had special skills or knowledge in relation to the subject matter.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q17: When there is a breach of a
Q18: Which of the following statements is the
Q19: Courts traditionally interpreted exclusion clauses contra proferentum,or
Q20: In relation to exclusion clauses there is
Q21: An intermediate or innominate term is neither
Q23: If a document containing an exclusion clause
Q24: Which of the following statements is the
Q25: The actual intention of the parties determines
Q26: Which of the following is NOT one
Q27: Why was the council held to be