Courts Traditionally Interpreted Exclusion Clauses Contra Proferentum,or Against the Interests
Essay
Courts traditionally interpreted exclusion clauses contra proferentum,or against the interests of the person seeking to rely on it.Why did the courts take this approach,and to what extent has it been displaced by alternative approaches?
Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI
The courts traditionally interpreted exc...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Answered by ExamLex AI
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q14: In order to establish that a collateral
Q15: Which of the following statements is the
Q16: The requirement of a certain event before
Q17: When there is a breach of a
Q18: Which of the following statements is the
Q20: In relation to exclusion clauses there is
Q21: An intermediate or innominate term is neither
Q22: Why was the statement found not to
Q23: If a document containing an exclusion clause
Q24: Which of the following statements is the