Multiple Choice
What was the reason for the decision in the case of Hoyt's Pty Ltd v Spencer (1919) 27 CLR 133?
A) The oral statement was promissory and therefore enforceable as a collateral contract.
B) The oral statement was representational rather than promissory.
C) The oral statement was intended to form part of the agreement between the parties.
D) The oral statement was inconsistent with the terms of the written document.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q36: If a collateral contract is inconsistent with
Q37: Why was the dry cleaning company held
Q38: If a contract contains uncertain or meaningless
Q39: Which of the following is NOT necessary
Q40: Why was the plaintiff unsuccessful in the
Q41: Which of the exceptions to the parol
Q43: Which of the following statements is the
Q44: Which of the following statements is incorrect?<br>A)The
Q45: Where there have been previous dealings between
Q46: If one of the parties had a