Solved

Why Was the Dry Cleaning Company Held to Be Liable

Question 37

Multiple Choice

Why was the dry cleaning company held to be liable in Curtis v Chemical Cleaning & Dyeing Co [1951] 1 KB 805?


A) Because the contract so provided.
B) Because the exemption clause in the contract was illegal.
C) Because exemption clauses are not enforceable.
D) Because the purpose of the exemption clause in the contract was misrepresented by the shop assistant.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions