Multiple Choice
In relation to 'conduct' under s 18 of the ACL,Clark Equipment Australia Ltd v Covcat Pty Ltd (1987) 71 ALR 367 is authority for the principle that:
A) pre-contractual representations can constitute misleading and deceptive conduct.
B) an advertisement which compared a competitor's products unfavourably with the advertiser's products can constitute misleading and deceptive conduct.
C) silence can constitute misleading and deceptive conduct where there is a duty to disclose relevant facts.
D) the act of making a contract containing a false warranty is sufficient to constitute misleading and deceptive conduct.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q19: Which of the following 'consumers' are NOT
Q20: Why was the conduct found to be
Q21: The Financial Services Reform Act 2001 (Cth)only
Q22: Section 82 of the Australian Consumer Law
Q23: The consumer protection provisions of the Australian
Q25: Under Section 50 of the Australian Consumer
Q26: What is an unfair contract under s
Q27: Conduct by a corporation or person in
Q28: Section 18 is not only available to
Q29: If a purchaser acts as a seller's