Why Was the Conduct Found to Be Misleading and Deceptive

Multiple Choice

Why was the conduct found to be misleading and deceptive in Pacific Dunlop v Hogan (1989) 23 FCR 553?

A) The use of the name might cause confusion in the minds of some consumers.
B) The conduct created the false impression that a commercial relationship existed between the parties.
C) The conduct was not found to be misleading and deceptive.
D) The misconception was caused by use of an existing name which already had a well-established reputation.