Multiple Choice
In Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona, concerning whether Arizona could, for safety considerations, require trains traveling through the state be a shorter length than trains traveling through other states. The Supreme Court held the Arizona law was:
A) valid because it concerned a legitimate state interest to improve transportation safety
B) valid because Congress had not passed legislation dealing with the length of trains
C) valid because it did not conflict with federal standards
D) invalid because it impeded interstate commerce
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q365: The Seventh Amendment of the U.S. Constitution:<br>A)
Q366: In New York v. Burger, a junkyard
Q367: The government seized a large amount of
Q368: Apportionment is meant to protect a company
Q369: Foreign commerce:<br>A) may be subject to discriminatory
Q371: The Supreme Court in Hughes v. Oklahoma
Q372: If Congress imposes a regulation on an
Q373: Amendments to the Constitution must be initiated
Q374: The exclusionary rule that improperly gathered evidence
Q375: Ohio Phone, a regulated company, sends a