Multiple Choice
Werner owns a number of animals that live in and around his home.Because Werner's house is located in a secluded area,he has little interaction with people outside of his immediate family.He consequently has never received any complaints about his animals until recently.That complaint has come in the form of a tort action by Madonna,who claims that she was wrongfully hurt by one of Werner's animals.The evidence establishes that she was bitten by the animal as she knocked on Werner's door with the intention of asking him to donate to a charity.Which of the following statements is TRUE?
A) Under the traditional common law rules,if the animal that bit Madonna was a wild wolverine,Werner could be held liable only if he knew that the animal was dangerous.
B) Strict liability is a type of vicarious liability.
C) Under the traditional common law rules,the owner of an animal may be held liable for any damage caused by the animal only if that owner intentionally or carelessly created the situation that resulted in the damage.
D) There are no defences to a strict liability tort.
E) Madonna may have a good arguable claim against Werner in the law of tort for compensatory damages for the injuries that she suffered.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Nelson successfully sued Horatio in tort.The court
Q10: Most alternative compensation schemes apply only if
Q65: Briefly identify and explain the manner in
Q66: Suneeta successfully sued Olaf in tort.In this
Q67: Abdul worked for Primus Finance Co.Following a
Q69: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Q71: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Q73: Ramon cut the grass that surrounded a
Q74: Makayla successfully sued Deacon for the tort
Q75: Teach Inc.sold a computer consulting business to