Multiple Choice
Abdul worked for Primus Finance Co.Following a series of disastrous losses,several of the company's customers have sued Abdul in tort.Because Abdul has relatively little money,however,those customers also want to sue Primus Finance.Primus Finance denies vicarious liability by arguing that Abdul was an independent contractor rather than an employee.A court is more likely to decide that Abdul was an independent contractor if
A) Abdul decided for himself when,where,and how he would provide services to Primus Finance.
B) in order to perform his work,Abdul used an office and computer system that belonged to Primus Finance.
C) the customers who are suing protected themselves against losses through insurance policies.
D) Abdul committed his torts against the company's clients deliberately rather than carelessly.
E) Abdul was paid a consistent amount by Primus Finance every two weeks.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Nelson successfully sued Horatio in tort.The court
Q10: Most alternative compensation schemes apply only if
Q62: Which of the following statements is TRUE?<br>A)Liability
Q63: Sidhu was injured when Melissa,a construction worker,carelessly
Q64: Jose has sued Sharona in tort as
Q65: Briefly identify and explain the manner in
Q66: Suneeta successfully sued Olaf in tort.In this
Q69: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Q70: Werner owns a number of animals that
Q71: Which of the following statements is TRUE