Rawls IncSued Nozick Ltd

Multiple Choice

Rawls Inc.sued Nozick Ltd.in tort.The court awarded nominal damages.This means that

A) Nozick must have committed the tort of negligence.
B) the court calculated the amount of damages for the primary purpose of deterrence.
C) Nozick must have committed an equitable wrong rather than a legal wrong.
D) Rawls did not prove that it suffered an actual loss as a result of Nozick's tort.
E) Nozick must have committed the tort of defamation.