Essay
Bondi Shipping Corp steered its ship,The Surf,into a dock that was owned by Bradman Inc.Bondi intended to make certain repairs to The Surf.During the course of those repairs,Bondi's employees carelessly allowed a chemical,known as australite,to leak into the water surrounding the dock.The australite,which floated on the surface of the water,caught fire after sparks from a welding gun that Bondi's employees were using fell into the water and onto the australite.The flames spread quickly and Bradman's dock was entirely destroyed.The total cost of the damage is $2 million.The court has found that Bondi is vicariously responsible for the actions of its employees,and that those employees committed the tort of negligence when they carelessly allowed australite to leak out of The Surf and onto the water.The court also found that while it is now obvious that australite is flammable in some circumstances,no one knew (or could have known)at the time of the accident that australite is flammable.Will Bondi be held liable to Bradman for compensatory damages? Provide the best explanation for your answer.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Bondi will likely not be held liable for...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q6: Max worked in a warehouse owned by
Q7: Although the same set of events may
Q8: Carlos has been sued for the tort
Q9: Klaus purposefully sneaks onto Kelly's property without
Q10: Robert successfully sued Marjorie in tort.Majorie has
Q12: Rawls Inc.sued Nozick Ltd.in tort.The court awarded
Q15: Alpha Corp owns a large plot of
Q16: Which of the following statements is TRUE
Q39: You may be held liable in tort
Q75: The provincial government has become very concerned