Essay
Armand conducts a study for his research method class. He is curious as to whether watching romantic movies makes people more committed to their romantic relationship. He collects a sample of men in dating relationships and divides them into two groups. One group watches a 5-minute clip of a movie in which the main characters are having a romantic first date. The second group watches a 5-minute clip from the same movie in which the main characters break up. After the participants watch the movie clip, they are then asked to write a sentence about their relationship. Armand counts the number of uses of the words we and us as a measure of commitment. After conducting the study, he finds that there is not a statistically significant difference between his two groups.
Armand's professor suggests that the null effect may be due to insufficient between-group variance. Describe two ways that Armand's study may have had poor between-group variance.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: Which of the following studies would NOT
Q3: A researcher's attempt to control sounds, smells,
Q4: Dr. Paddock is a counseling psychologist who
Q5: In previous studies, Dr. Schulenberg has established
Q6: Testing threats involve , whereas instrumentation threats
Q7: In what way does high within-groups variance
Q8: Name the three threats to internal validity
Q9: Dr. Paddock is a counseling psychologist who
Q10: Dr. Hoff is curious as to whether
Q11: In previous studies, Dr. Schulenberg has established