Multiple Choice
Carrie,a white employee,alleged that she was forced to leave her job for refusing to follow her employer's discriminatory practices against Asian employees.In this case,the court likely would decide:
A) Carrie had no right to sue her employer because she was a white employee.
B) Carrie had a valid claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
C) the employer had no potential liability for the discriminatory practices because Carrie was the one responsible for implementing those practices.
D) Carrie had no valid claim under Title VII because she was forced out for disobeying orders. She had no potential liability for discrimination.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q34: Which of the following may constitute national
Q35: When an employee complains to his or
Q36: Describe an employer's best approach to avoiding
Q37: Describe discrimination based on color,and why it
Q38: Aaron,an African-American with a meritorious law degree,is
Q40: In the case Bradley v.Pizzaco of Nebraska,d/b/a
Q41: Largely as a result of affirmative action,women
Q42: Brynn was employed as a flight attendant
Q43: Which of the following is an effective
Q44: Pat,a black woman,had been working as an