Multiple Choice
Ellis agreed to paint Lee's house for a price of $1500.A month before the performance was due,Lee called and told Ellis that she had changed her mind and was going to have her house restuccoed instead.Ellis insisted that they had a contract and that he was going to paint the house anyway.Lee repeated that she was not going to go through with it,but Ellis insisted the contract was still on.Before further steps could be taken by either party,Lee's house was destroyed by a freak airplane accident.Which one of the following statements describes the law applicable to these facts?
A) Ellis's conduct amounted to repudiation, and Lee could have sued for breach of contract immediately after the phone call.
B) Lee could have accepted Ellis's conduct as an anticipatory breach.
C) The contract has been discharged by frustration.
D) Ellis will be able to successfully claim as damages the amount that he would have made if the contract had been performed.
E) Lee's conduct did not amount to a breach since she told him a month before performance was due that she didn't want the house painted.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q15: When a contract anticipates some catastrophic event,
Q44: Which of the following statements is correct
Q46: Which of the following is true with
Q47: Which of the following is false with
Q48: In a jurisdiction other than B.C.,Mr.Buyer sued
Q53: Sam entered into a contract for the
Q56: Explain the limitations on the ability to
Q84: When an outside, unforeseen event interferes with
Q104: Injunction is an example of an equitable
Q136: The purpose of damages in contract law