Multiple Choice
In a jurisdiction other than B.C.,Mr.Buyer sued Mr.Seller for breach of contract because Mr.Seller failed to deliver a computer system on time in accordance with the contract.Mr.Seller argued that he was not in breach,that the contract had been frustrated.The computer was destroyed by water when a careless driver knocked over a fire hydrant outside the warehouse holding the computer.No deposit had been paid.The court held that the contract was frustrated.Given this ruling,how does the court handle the situation?
A) Buyer will succeed against Seller for damages because the court will treat it as if were an anticipatory breach.
B) The court will let the losses lie where they fell, despite any of Seller's costs in preparing the computer system.
C) Buyer will not have to pay anything to Seller unless Seller had requested a deposit at the time of contract.
D) The court will look at the costs incurred and any payments made, and will apportion the losses between the parties.
E) The court will treat the contract as if there were a common mistake about the existence of the subject matter.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q44: Which of the following statements is correct
Q46: Which of the following is true with
Q47: Which of the following is false with
Q50: Ellis agreed to paint Lee's house for
Q53: Sam entered into a contract for the
Q56: Explain the limitations on the ability to
Q84: When an outside, unforeseen event interferes with
Q112: A person who breaches a contract is
Q117: Discuss exculpatory (exemption) clauses and how the
Q136: The purpose of damages in contract law