Write a Complete Analysis Plus Evaluation for Each of the Following

Question

Examlex · Accepted Answer

The Answer is This passage contains an argument. The issue is whether insider trading is inevitable. The unstated conclusion is that insider trading is not inevitable. The first premise is that if insider trading is inevitable, then there wouldn't be laws against it. The second premise is that there are laws against insider trading.
This argument is a deductive truth-functional argument.
According to the writers at Fortune, 1. insider trading is inevitable. However, 2. if that were True, then there wouldn't be laws against it, and 3. insider trading is illegal.
4. Insider trading is not inevitable.

This passage contains an argument. The issue is whether insider trading is inevitable. The unstated conclusion is that insider trading is not inevitable. The first premise is that if insider trading is inevitable, then there wouldn't be laws against it. The second premise is that there are laws against insider trading. This argument is a deductive truth-functional argument. According to the writers at Fortune, 1. insider trading is inevitable. However, 2. if that were True, then there wouldn't be laws against it, and 3. insider trading is illegal. 4. Insider trading is not inevitable.

Write a Complete Analysis Plus Evaluation for Each of the Following

Essay

Correct Answer:
Verified

Write a Complete Analysis Plus Evaluation for Each of the Following

Essay

Correct Answer:VerifiedShow Answer

Correct Answer:
Verified