Multiple Choice
Which of the following offers the best reason why restaurants are not considered to be perfectly competitive firms?
A) Restaurants do not sell identical products.
B) Restaurants compete in small market areas - neighbourhoods and cities - rather than in regional or national markets.Therefore, restaurants are not small relative to their market size.
C) Restaurants usually have entry barriers in the form of zoning restrictions and health regulations.
D) Restaurants have significant liability costs that perfectly competitive firms do not have; for example, customers may sue if they suffer from food poisoning.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q52: In the short run, a profit-maximising firm
Q53: To maximise profit, a perfectly competitive firm<br>A)should
Q57: Figure 8.14 <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB1015/.jpg" alt="Figure 8.14
Q58: Table 8.4 <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB1015/.jpg" alt="Table 8.4
Q59: Figure 8.12 <img src="https://d2lvgg3v3hfg70.cloudfront.net/TB1015/.jpg" alt="Figure 8.12
Q83: If a firm's total variable cost exceeds
Q124: A perfectly competitive firm's marginal revenue curve
Q188: In the long run, perfectly competitive firms
Q217: When firms exit a perfectly competitive industry,
Q253: If, in a perfectly competitive industry, the