Multiple Choice
In the text case,Lucy Mydlach v.DaimlerChrysler Corp,the questions at issue were whether the plaintiff could bring a revocation of acceptance claim against a vehicle manufacturer,and when the statute of limitations began to run under the Magnuson-Moss Act.Which of the following was the result on appeal?
A) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when repairs under warranty were not properly made.
B) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could not be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when the vehicle was sold.
C) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could not be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when the manufacturer was notified that a problem with the vehicle existed.
D) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when the vehicle was sold.
E) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could not be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when repairs under warranty were not properly made.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q23: The primary codification of both state and
Q24: Is it likely that Ryan will be
Q25: In Kazakhstan,Western law's "warranty" is referred to
Q26: If a seller wants to disclaim an
Q27: Gianna buys a toaster that shocks her
Q29: Which of the following is NOT true
Q30: A brochure for a knife states: "This
Q31: Is Ryan correct that the car was
Q32: Craig went into a hardware store to
Q33: What is the warranty of assignability at