In the Text Case,Lucy Mydlach V

Multiple Choice

In the text case,Lucy Mydlach v.DaimlerChrysler Corp,the questions at issue were whether the plaintiff could bring a revocation of acceptance claim against a vehicle manufacturer,and when the statute of limitations began to run under the Magnuson-Moss Act.Which of the following was the result on appeal?

A) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when repairs under warranty were not properly made.
B) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could not be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when the vehicle was sold.
C) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could not be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when the manufacturer was notified that a problem with the vehicle existed.
D) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when the vehicle was sold.
E) The court ruled that a revocation of acceptance claim could not be brought against a vehicle manufacturer and that the statute of limitation under the Magnuson-Moss Act began to run when repairs under warranty were not properly made.