Multiple Choice
Is it likely that Ryan will be able to recover damages based upon a breach of the implied warranty of merchantability?
A) No,because of the lack of an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose.
B) Yes,because Kristin told Ryan that the car would pull the boat.
C) Yes,because Ryan informed Kristin about the need for the car to pull the boat.
D) No,because there was no warranty of merchantability.
E) No,because the implied warranty of merchantability was that the car would,for example,be fit for the ordinary purposes for which such goods are used.Pulling the boat was not an ordinary purpose for that small car.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q19: A sample or model may provide an
Q20: Perry and Tim negotiate a contract governed
Q21: When does the Magnuson-Moss act apply?<br>A)To all
Q22: Which of the following is false regarding
Q23: The primary codification of both state and
Q25: In Kazakhstan,Western law's "warranty" is referred to
Q26: If a seller wants to disclaim an
Q27: Gianna buys a toaster that shocks her
Q28: In the text case,Lucy Mydlach v.DaimlerChrysler Corp,the
Q29: Which of the following is NOT true