Essay
Sally and Ed each own property with a fair market value less than the amount of the outstanding mortgage on the property and also less than the original cost basis. They each were able to convince the mortgage holder to reduce the principal amount on the mortgage. Sally's mortgage is on her personal residence and Ed's mortgage is on rental property he owns. Both debts are recourse.
a.Each taxpayer's liabilities were reduced. Therefore, their net worth has increased as measured using the cost basis in the assets. Each taxpayer also experienced a loss in the value of their assets. However, the losses were not realized (because each taxpayer still owns the property). Thus, each taxpayer had income from the reduction in debt, but no recognized loss. Fortunately, recent legislation permits in effect through 2017, the taxpayer whose property is a personal residence to exclude the income from debt discharge from gross income. The taxpayer who owns the rental home is not eligible for this debt discharge exclusion.
b. Allowing the exclusion from income for the homeowner but not for the investor can only be justified on the basis of a value system that says we should modify the otherwise equitable rules to favor home ownership.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Each taxpayer's liabilities were reduced...View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Correct Answer:
Verified
View Answer
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge
Q4: The taxpayer's marginal federal and state tax
Q46: The de minimis fringe benefit:<br>A)Exclusion applies only
Q61: Fresh Bakery often has unsold donuts at
Q85: Sharon had some insider information about a
Q86: During the current year, Khalid was in
Q88: Agnes receives a $5,000 scholarship which covers
Q89: Early in the year, Marion was in
Q91: Meg's employer carries insurance on its employees
Q93: Nicole's employer pays her $150 per month
Q95: Tommy, a senior at State College, receives