Solved

The Rule in Foakes V Beer Was Not Applied in Hirachand

Question 9

Multiple Choice

The rule in Foakes v Beer was not applied in Hirachand Punamchand v Temple [1911] 2 KB 330 because:

A) The payment was accepted by the creditor.
B) The debt was paid by a third party.
C) The debt was paid with interest.
D) The debt was paid in full.

Related Questions

Q1: Which of the following is the best

Q6: The plaintiff in Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co

Q8: Consideration must be:<br>A) Valuable, adequate and sufficient.<br>B)

Q11: The decision in Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd

Q12: Simple contracts must contain a bargain.

Q13: To what extent has the doctrine of

Q16: Estoppel was rejected Easts Van Villages v

Q23: Which of the following is NOT one

Q24: In which case did the court decide

Q30: A promise to accept a lesser sum