Solved

The Decision in Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd V Maher (1998)

Question 11

Multiple Choice

The decision in Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1998) 164 CLR 387 is significant because:


A) Promissory estoppel was applied where there was no pre-existing contract.
B) Promissory estoppel was used to commence an action.
C) Promissory estoppel was applied in Australia.
D) All of the above.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions