Multiple Choice
Davenport and Potter (2004) examined the effects of context on recognition of objects.They found that
A) objects were recognized most easily when they were not presented in a background scene.
B) foreground objects were more easily identified than background objects.
C) background objects were more easily identified than foreground objects.
D) there was a weak effect of consistency between the object and the background scene.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q40: The fuzzy boundaries in categories is best
Q41: The experiment by Tanaka and Farah (1993)that
Q42: Which of these is a basic level
Q43: What did the research of Pecher,Zeelenberg,and Barsalou
Q44: One resolution of the image-based vs.view-based object
Q45: One of the major criticisms of the
Q46: The exploratory procedures in haptic exploration identified
Q47: The effects context,or a background scene,has on
Q48: Suppose that your knowledge about the category
Q49: In terms of categorization,family resemblance means<br>A)separation between