Multiple Choice
Mr. Johnson, a white male, testified for the plaintiffs in a racial discrimination lawsuit brought by a black female employee against his employer, Security Bank. He had been advised by his manager not to get involved. Shortly thereafter, Mr. Johnson was fired.
A) Mr. Johnson has no case for retaliatory discharge because he is not a member of the protected class.
B) Mr. Johnson has no case for retaliatory discharge because merely testifying on behalf of someone else is insufficient involvement in a discrimination lawsuit to get protection against retaliatory discharge under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
C) Mr. Johnson has no case for retaliatory discharge because he is an employment-at-will employee.
D) Mr. Johnson may have a case because Title VII of the Civil Rights Act protects an employee who participates in any manner in an investigation, proceeding or hearing on a colleague's complaint of discrimination.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q34: Describe the basic legal theory that is
Q35: If the plaintiff cannot establish a prima
Q36: Ms. Lee was employed as a secretary
Q37: BJI Enterprises requires all employees to pass
Q38: Every successful claimant in a Title VII
Q40: Emmanuel and Petersen is an extremely busy
Q41: Davis Hosiery Mills has each new employee
Q42: What are the requirements imposed on employers
Q43: The following defenses are available to employers
Q44: Harrison works in a cubicle at a