Field and Lawson (2003) reported the effects of giving children aged 7-9 years positive, negative or no information about novel animals (Australian marsupials). This variable was called 'Infotype'. The gender of the child was also examined. The outcome was the time taken for the children to put their hand in a box in which they believed either the positive, negative, or no information animal was housed (positive values = longer than average approach times, negative values = shorter than average approach times). Based on the output below, what could you conclude? $Field and Lawson (2003) reported the effects of giving children aged 7-9 years positive, negative or no information about novel animals (Australian marsupials). This variable was called 'Infotype'. The gender of the child was also examined. The outcome was the time taken for the children to put their hand in a box in which they believed either the positive, negative, or no information animal was housed (positive values = longer than average approach times, negative values = shorter than average approach times). Based on the output below, what could you conclude? \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad Tests of Within-Subjects Effects Measure: MEASURE 1 \begin{array}{|ll|r|r|r|r|r|} \hline & \text { Source } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Type III Sum } \\ \text { of Squares } \end{array} &{\text { df }} & \text { Mean Square } & {\text { F }} &{\text { Sig. }} \\ \hline \text { INFOTYPE } & \text { Sphericity Assumed } & 9.177 & 2 & 4.588 & 7.283 & .001 \\ & \text { Greenhouse-Geisser } & 9.177 & 1.940 & 4.730 & 7.283 & .001 \\ & \text { Huynh-Feldt } & 9.177 & 2.000 & 4.588 & 7.283 & .001 \\ & \text { Lower-bound } & 9.177 & 1.000 & 9.177 & 7.283 & .010 \\ \hline \text { INFOTYPE * GENDER } & \text { Sphericity Assumed } & .599 & 2 & .299 & .475 & .623 \\ & \text { Greenhouse-Geisser } & .599 & 1.940 & .309 & .475 & .618 \\ & \text { Huynh-Feldt } & .599 & 2.000 & .299 & .475 & .623 \\ & \text { Lower-bound } & .599 & 1.000 & .599 & .475 & 495 \\ \hline \text { Error(INFOTYPE) } & \text { Sphericity Assumed } & 51.664 & 82 & .630 & & \\ & \text { Greenhouse-Geisser } & 51.664 & 79.544 & .650 & & \\ & \text { Huynh-Feldt } & 51.664 & 82.000 & 630 & &\\ \hline \end{array} \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad Tests of Between-Subjects Effects Measure: MEASURE_1 Transformed Variable: Average \begin{array}{|l|r|r|r|r|r|} \hline \text { Source } & \begin{array}{c} \text { Type III Sum } \\ \text { of Squares } \end{array} & {\text { df }} & \text { Mean Square } &{\text { F }} & {\text { Sig. }} \\ \hline \text { Intercept } & 2.034 \mathrm{E}-02 & 1 & 2.034 \mathrm{E}-02 & .049 & 826 \\ \text { GENDER } & 1.822 \mathrm{E}-03 & 1 & 1.822 \mathrm{E}-03 & 004 & .948 \\ \text { Error } & 17.109 & 41 & -417 & & \\ \hline \end{array} A)Approach times were significantly different for the boxes containing the different animals, and the pattern of results was affected by gender. B)Approach times were not significantly different for the boxes containing the different animals, but the pattern of results was affected by gender. C)Approach times were not significantly different for the boxes containing the different animals, but the pattern of results was unaffected by gender. D)Approach times were significantly different for the boxes containing the different animals, but the pattern of results was unaffected by gender.$

\quad

\quad

\quad

\quad

\quad

\quad

\quad

\quad

\quad

\quad

\quad

\quad

Tests of Within-Subjects Effects
Measure: MEASURE 1

\begin{array}{|ll|r|r|r|r|r|} \hline & \text { Source } & \begin{array}{c}\text { Type III Sum } \\\text { of Squares }\end{array} &{\text { df }} & \text { Mean Square } & {\text { F }} &{\text { Sig. }} \\\hline \text { INFOTYPE } & \text { Sphericity Assumed } & 9.177 & 2 & 4.588 & 7.283 & .001 \\& \text { Greenhouse-Geisser } & 9.177 & 1.940 & 4.730 & 7.283 & .001 \\& \text { Huynh-Feldt } & 9.177 & 2.000 & 4.588 & 7.283 & .001 \\& \text { Lower-bound } & 9.177 & 1.000 & 9.177 & 7.283 & .010 \\\hline \text { INFOTYPE * GENDER } & \text { Sphericity Assumed } & .599 & 2 & .299 & .475 & .623 \\& \text { Greenhouse-Geisser } & .599 & 1.940 & .309 & .475 & .618 \\& \text { Huynh-Feldt } & .599 & 2.000 & .299 & .475 & .623 \\& \text { Lower-bound } & .599 & 1.000 & .599 & .475 & 495 \\\hline \text { Error(INFOTYPE) } & \text { Sphericity Assumed } & 51.664 & 82 & .630 & & \\& \text { Greenhouse-Geisser } & 51.664 & 79.544 & .650 & & \\& \text { Huynh-Feldt } & 51.664 & 82.000 & 630 & &\\\hline\end{array}

\quad

\quad

\quad

\quad

\quad

\quad

\quad

\quad

\quad

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects
Measure: MEASURE_1
Transformed Variable: Average

\begin{array}{|l|r|r|r|r|r|}\hline \text { Source } & \begin{array}{c}\text { Type III Sum } \\\text { of Squares }\end{array} & {\text { df }} & \text { Mean Square } &{\text { F }} & {\text { Sig. }} \\\hline \text { Intercept } & 2.034 \mathrm{E}-02 & 1 & 2.034 \mathrm{E}-02 & .049 & 826 \\\text { GENDER } & 1.822 \mathrm{E}-03 & 1 & 1.822 \mathrm{E}-03 & 004 & .948 \\\text { Error } & 17.109 & 41 & -417 & & \\\hline\end{array}

A)Approach times were significantly different for the boxes containing the different animals, and the pattern of results was affected by gender.
B)Approach times were not significantly different for the boxes containing the different animals, but the pattern of results was affected by gender.
C)Approach times were not significantly different for the boxes containing the different animals, but the pattern of results was unaffected by gender.
D)Approach times were significantly different for the boxes containing the different animals, but the pattern of results was unaffected by gender.

A Three-Way ANOVA

Multiple Choice

Correct Answer:VerifiedUnlock this answer nowGet Access to more Verified Answers free of chargeAccess For Free

Correct Answer:
Verified
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge