Solved

Imagine We Were Trying to Interpret the Results of a 3

Question 13

Multiple Choice

Imagine we were trying to interpret the results of a 3  3 two-way repeated-measures ANOVA. The data analysis contains no information about sphericity. In this situation, which of the following rows from the output should be interpreted?


A) The Greenhouse-Geisser row, as it is better to assume sphericity has been violated.
B) The row labelled 'sphericity assumed', as it is better to assume sphericity has been met.
C) The Bonferroni row, as it is always better to assume sphericity has been violated.
D) The row labelled 'sphericity assumed', as sphericity is not an issue when there are only two independent variables.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions