An alarm call benefits multiple individuals, both related and unrelated (r ? 0). Can this behavior still evolve according to Hamilton's rule? (There are 1, 2, . . . , A individuals that are related to the donor by r₁, r₂,…, r_A and receive benefits b₁, b₂,…, b_A)
A) No; unrelated individuals will automatically set the benefits to 0, as Hamilton's rule for
Multiple individuals is
$An alarm call benefits multiple individuals, both related and unrelated (r ? 0). Can this behavior still evolve according to Hamilton's rule? (There are 1, 2, . . . , A individuals that are related to the donor by r1, r2,…, rA and receive benefits b1, b2,…, bA) A) No; unrelated individuals will automatically set the benefits to 0, as Hamilton's rule for Multiple individuals is B) No; this case no longer addresses inclusive fitness, and Hamilton's rule does not apply. C) Yes, if there are more related individuals benefiting than unrelated individuals, as Hamilton's rule for multiple individuals is \sum _ { 1 } ^ { A } r _ { 1 } b _ { i } - c > 0 D) Yes, as long as the benefits to related individuals satisfy \sum _ { 1 } ^ { A } r _ { i } b _ { i } - c > 0$
B) No; this case no longer addresses inclusive fitness, and Hamilton's rule does not apply.
C) Yes, if there are more related individuals benefiting than unrelated individuals, as Hamilton's rule for multiple individuals is

\sum _ { 1 } ^ { A } r _ { 1 } b _ { i } - c > 0

D) Yes, as long as the benefits to related individuals satisfy

\sum _ { 1 } ^ { A } r _ { i } b _ { i } - c > 0

In Order for a Game to Be a True Prisoner's

Multiple Choice

Correct Answer:VerifiedUnlock this answer nowGet Access to more Verified Answers free of chargeAccess For Free

Correct Answer:
Verified
Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge