In Circuit City Stores,Inc

Multiple Choice

In Circuit City Stores,Inc.v.Adams,the U.S.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that Circuit City's contract was

A) enforceable because it was a standard form contract.
B) enforceable because employees were required to arbitrate their dis?putes and the employer was free to litigate its claims in court.
C) unenforceable because the Federal Arbitration Act does not apply to such contracts.
D) unenforceable because it was unconscionable.