Multiple Choice
Which of the following is true with regard to the intention of the parties to an agreement to enter into a legal relationship? Where appropriate, assume that all the other elements necessary to form a contract are present.
A) The court makes presumptions about the intention of parties to be bound, whether that presumption may be rebutted by evidence to the contrary, makes no difference to the court.
B) Since family matters are private matters, an agreement between a husband and wife to transfer property from the husband to the wife could not be a contract even if all the other elements of a contract were present.
C) An intention to be legally bound is not a necessary element of a contract.
D) The court will presume there is always an intent to be legally bound in family situations.
E) Parties may expressly state their intention to be legally bound, in which case the court need not rely on presumptions.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Smith ran a software-design business. He needed
Q2: The contract signed by XYZ Ltd. and
Q4: Parents are responsible for their children's actions
Q7: (Modify this question for your jurisdiction.) Bill,
Q9: In the classic case of Carlill v.
Q10: When John bought a car from his
Q11: Which of the following contracts is void?<br>A)
Q34: Why was the Statute of Frauds originally
Q52: Describe how infants are treated in contract
Q58: Joe advertised his house for sale,and Sam