Multiple Choice
The contract signed by XYZ Ltd. and Charles provided that the company would receive a licence to use the computer program that Charles was creating, that Charles would complete the program by January 15, 2012, that Charles would retain copyright, and that Charles would receive $10,000 on completion of his work. Two weeks before the due date, Charles told the president of the company that he was not going to complete on time. The president said, "Don't worry about it; get it done as soon as you can." Charles was 10 days late in completing the work. The delay caused the company to lose money, so it sued Charles for damages. On these facts (which you should assume can be proved) , which of the following is false?
A) Charles could use equitable (promissory) estoppel as a defence.
B) The company has the right to sue even though it is not a natural person.
C) If this case were heard in the B.C. Supreme Court, the judge would have to follow a precedent on the point set by the B.C. Court of Appeal.
D) Charles could enter his defence and could also enter a counterclaim if he felt he had an action against the company.
E) The company doesn't have the right to sue because the law would presume that the parties did not intend to be legally bound.
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: Smith ran a software-design business. He needed
Q4: Parents are responsible for their children's actions
Q5: Which of the following is true with
Q7: (Modify this question for your jurisdiction.) Bill,
Q9: In the classic case of Carlill v.
Q10: When John bought a car from his
Q11: Which of the following contracts is void?<br>A)
Q34: Why was the Statute of Frauds originally
Q52: Describe how infants are treated in contract
Q58: Joe advertised his house for sale,and Sam