Multiple Choice
What was the central question in CASE 3.1,Wal-Mart Stores,Inc.v.Dukes (2011) ?
A) Could Wal-Mart be properly sued in federal or in state court?
B) Could sufficient commonality among Wal-Mart employees be shown to certify the group as a class?
C) Could one Wal-Mart employee represent more than 1 million other employees?
D) Did the employees waive their rights to arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act?
Correct Answer:

Verified
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q1: A _ reverses the jury verdict on
Q3: Most states have _ statutes,which can subject
Q4: A case involving a federal question may
Q5: The process of questioning the witnesses in
Q6: Personal jurisdiction is based on the residence
Q7: CASE 3.2,Morris v.Ernst & Young (2017)before the
Q8: The courts returned a verdict against Finch
Q9: Court opinions are published in collections called
Q10: The common law doctrine of _ means
Q11: When the U.S.Supreme Court decides to hear